Readify

Everett Dynes

The Ax

Everett Dynes is defined in the surviving account of his story by the way Burke Devore killed him: in Lichgate, using a car rather than a gun. Though the book’s available references to Dynes are brief and filtered through Burke’s thoughts, his death shapes both the methods Burke can use afterward and the memories he cannot entirely suppress.

Death in Lichgate

Burke recalls that he could not repeat what he had done to Dynes if a later target were inside a car. The comparison establishes the car as the instrument of Dynes’s killing and makes the circumstances of that earlier murder a tactical limit on Burke’s next attempt. Dynes’s death is not described here from his own perspective; it enters the narrative as part of the killer’s calculation.

A separate reflection distinguishes the murder from Burke’s shootings. Burke realizes that the Luger had not been used on Dynes, and that the gun therefore did not connect Dynes’s death to the other victims associated with it. The distinction underscores that Burke’s crimes do not all leave the same evidentiary trace: the method used against Dynes differs from the shootings that risk linking cases through ballistics.

A Memory That Interrupts

Dynes returns to Burke’s mind while Burke waits in his car and watches a man leave a restaurant and walk toward a black car. As the man recedes in the mirrors, Burke remembers Dynes, briefly closes his eyes, and tries to set the memory aside. The gesture gives Dynes a presence beyond the practical fact of his death: for a moment, the earlier victim interrupts Burke’s observation of a possible new one.

Narrative Significance

Dynes is presented through recurrence rather than an extended account of his identity. First his murder supplies a precedent that Burke weighs against the circumstances of a later attack; later, recollection makes that same precedent emotionally difficult to keep at a distance. The two references hold together the procedural and moral dimensions of Burke’s violence: Dynes’s killing is a method to assess, a source of forensic distinction, and a memory that still intrudes.